Because of a little lovin'

Just a thought. Are people celebrating Phillip Seymore Hoffman's performance because he's a homosexual whom we do not have to watch having sex, as we do with Heath Ledger's Ennis? I mean, I'm not insinuating that Ledger is a better actor than Hoffman, this is certainly not the case, but it is very convenient for the academy and those other award people to pick Hoffman over Ledger because, like Swank or Therron, he is the "ugly" homosexual. It is a shame that he is invalid for the award because he is sexualized. Not that it comes as any surprise that a little... would fuck up his oscar prospects. Watch Gyllenhaal win because of the fate his character meets at the end of the film.